NAV as on Mar 31, 2018:
|Performance of Reliance Liquid Fund - Treasury Plan as on 31/03/2018|
|Particulars||Simple Annualised %|| CAGR %|
|7 Days||15 Days||30 Days||1 Year||3 Year||5 Year||Since Inception|
|Reliance Liquid Fund - Treasury Plan||11.61||8.85||8.19||6.78||7.42||8.12||7.39|
|B: Crisil Liquid Fund Index||11.78||8.06||8.61||6.84||7.33||8.08||6.97|
|AB: Crisil 1 Yr T-Bill Index||15.56||10.17||9.60||5.92||6.91||7.05||5.95|
|Reliance Liquid Fund - Treasury Plan||10,018||10,033||10,063||10,678||12,398||14,788||27,770|
|B: Crisil Liquid Fund Index||10,018||10,030||10,066||10,684||12,367||14,763||26,240|
|AB: Crisil 1 Yr T-Bill Index||10,024||10,037||10,073||10,592||12,223||14,067||22,885|
Inception Date: Dec 9, 2003|
|B - Benchmark | AB - Additional Benchmark |
|Fund Manager: Anju Chhajer (Since Oct 2013)|
PERFORMANCE OF OTHER OPEN ENDED SCHEMES MANAGED BY FUND MANAGER: Anju Chhajer
|Scheme Name/s||CAGR %|
|1 Year Return ||3 Years Return||5 Years Return|
|Scheme ||Benchmark ||Scheme ||Benchmark ||Scheme ||Benchmark |
|Reliance Japan Equity Fund||17.99||14.87||5.80||5.49||N.A.||N.A.|
|Reliance Retirement Fund - Wealth Creation Scheme||14.94||12.23||9.37||8.39||N.A.||N.A.|
|Reliance US Equity Opportunites Fund||13.85||12.55||N.A.||N.A.||N.A.||N.A.|
|Reliance Banking & PSU Debt Fund||6.36||6.17||N.A.||N.A.||N.A.||N.A.|
|Reliance Liquid Fund - Cash Plan||5.94||6.84||6.58||7.33||7.34||8.08|
|Reliance Retirement Fund - Income Generation Scheme||4.92||6.26||6.42||8.42||N.A.||N.A.|
a.Ms. Anju Chhajer manages 10 open-ended schemes of Reliance Mutual Fund .
b. In case the number of schemes managed by a fund manager is more than six, in the performance data of other schemes,the top 3 and bottom 3 schemes managed by fund manager has been provided herein are on the basis of 1 Year CAGR returns.
c. Period for which scheme’s performance has been provided is computed basis last day of the month-end preceding the date of advertisement.
d. Different plans shall have a different expense structure. The performance details provided herein are of Growth Plan (Regular Plan).
TRI - Total Returns Index reflects the returns on the index arising from (a) constituent stock price movements and (b) dividend receipts from constituent index stocks, thereby showing a true picture of returns.
The performance of the equity scheme is benchmarked to the Total Return variant of the Index.
Ms. Anju Chhajer has been managing Reliance Money Manager Fund since Oct 2009, Reliance Medium Term Fund since Oct 2009, Reliance Liquid Fund - Cash Plan since Oct 2013, Reliance Liquid Fund - Treasury Plan sinceOct 2013, Reliance Japan Equity Fund since Aug 2014, Reliance Retirement Fund - Wealth Creation Scheme since Feb 2015, Reliance Retirement Fund - Income Generation Scheme sinceFeb 2015, Reliance Banking & PSU Debt Fund since May 2015, Reliance Equity Savings Fund since May 2015, Reliance US Equity Opportunities Fund since Jul 2015
Past performance may or may not be sustained in future and the same may not necessarily provide the basis for comparison with other Investment. Dividends (if any) are assumed to be reinvested at the prevailing NAV. In case of LIQUIDBEES, returns are based on gross dividend per unit declared by the Fund. Bonus (if any) declared has been adjusted. Performance of dividend option would be Net of Dividend distribution tax, if any. Face value of scheme is
`10/- per unit. Face Value of Reliance Money Manager Fund is
`1000/- per unit. Face Value of Reliance Liquidity Fund, Reliance Liquid Fund - Treasury Plan & Reliance Liquid Fund - Cash Plan is
`1000/- per unit w.e.f 5th Aug 2012. Face value of Reliance ETF Junior BeES is
`1.25/- per unit. Face value of Reliance ETF Liquid BeES is
`1000/- per unit. Face value of Reliance ETF Gold BeES is
`100/- per unit. In case, the start/end date of the concerned period is non-business day (NBD), the NAV of the previous date is considered for computation of returns. Schemes which have not completed one year, performance details for the same are not provided. Performance details of closed ended schemes are not provided since these are not comparable with other schemes.